vineri, 4 aprilie 2014

A TALE OF A TUB -WRITTEN FOR THE UNIVERSAL IMPROVEMENT OF MANKIND - UM MANUAL COM 310 ANOS DE IDADE DE FALHANÇOS EDUCATIVOS MESMO EM MENINOS SEXUALMENTE INACTIVOS E POUCO VIVOS - 1704-2014 TRICENTENÁRIO E PICOS DE ILETRADOS QUE PENSAM SABER ESCREVER ERA DE PREVER


"A Tale of a Tub" is divided between various forms of digression and sections of a "tale." The "tale," or narrative, is an allegory that concerns the adventures of three brothers, Peter, Martin, and Jack, as they attempt to make their way in the world. Each of the brothers represents one of the primary branches of Christianity in the West. This part of the book is a pun on "tub," which Alexander Pope says was a common term for a Dissenter's pulpit, and a reference to Swift's own position as a clergyman. Peter (named for Saint Peter) stands in for the Roman Catholic Church. Jack (named for John Calvin, but whom Swift also connects to "Jack of Leyden") represents the various Dissenting Protestant churches such as Baptists, Presbyterians, Quakers, Congregationalists, or Anabaptists. The third brother, middle born and middle standing, is Martin (named for Martin Luther), whom Swift uses to represent the 'via media' of the Church of England. The brothers have inherited three wonderfully satisfactory coats (representing religious practice) by their father (representing God), and they have his will (representing the Bible) to guide them. Although the will says that the brothers are forbidden from making any changes to their coats, they do nearly nothing but alter their coats from the start. In as much as the will represents the Bible and the coat represents the practice of Christianity, the allegory of the narrative is supposed to be an apology for the Anglican church's refusal to alter its practice in accordance with Puritan demands and its continued resistance to alliance with the Roman church.

From its opening (once past the prolegomena, which comprises the first three sections), the book alternates between Digression and Tale. However, the digressions overwhelm the narrative, both in their length and in the forcefulness and imaginativeness of writing. Furthermore, after Chapter X (the commonly anthologised "Digression on Madness"), the labels for the sections are incorrect. Sections then called "Tale" are Digressions, and those called "Digression" are also Digressions.

A Tale of a Tub is an enormous parody with a number of smaller parodies within it. Many critics have followed Swift's biographer Irvin Ehrenpreis in arguing that there is no single, consistent narrator in the work. One difficulty with this position, however, is that if there is no single character posing as the author, then it is at least clear that nearly all of the "personae" employed by Swift for the parodies are so much alike that they function as a single identity. In general, whether a 20th-century reader would view the book as consisting of dozens of impersonations or a single one, Swift writes the Tale through the pose of a Modern or New Man. See the abridged discussion of the "Ancients and Moderns," below, for more on the nature of the "modern man" in Swift's day.

Swift's explanation for the title of the book is that the Ship of State was threatened by a whale (specifically, the Leviathan of Thomas Hobbes) and the new political societies (the Rota Club is mentioned). His book is intended to be a tub that the sailors of state (the nobles and ministers) might toss over the side to divert the attention of the beast (those who questioned the government and its right to rule). Hobbes was highly controversial in the Restoration, but Swift's invocation of Hobbes might well be ironic. The narrative of the brothers is a faulty allegory, and Swift's narrator is either a madman or a fool. The book is not one that could occupy the Leviathan, or preserve the Ship of State, so Swift may be intensifying the dangers of Hobbes's critique rather than allaying them to provoke a more rational response.

The digressions individually frustrate readers who expect a clear purpose. Each digression has its own topic, and each is an essay on its particular sidelight. In his biography of Swift, Ehrenpreis argued that each digression is an impersonation of a different contemporary author. This is the "persona theory," which holds that the Tale is not one parody, but rather a series of parodies, arising out of chamber performance in the Temple household. Prior to Ehrenpreis, some critics had argued that the narrator of the Tale is a character, just as the narrator of a novel would be. Given the evidence of A. C. Elias about the acrimony of Swift's departure from the Temple household, evidence from Swift's Journal to Stella about how uninvolved in the Temple household Swift had been, and the number of repeated observations about himself by the Tale's author, it seems reasonable to propose that the digressions reflect a single type of man, if not a particular character.

In any case, the digressions are each readerly tests; each tests whether or not the reader is intelligent and sceptical enough to detect nonsense. Some, such as the discussion of ears or of wisdom being like a nut, a cream sherry, a cackling hen, etc., are outlandish and require a militantly aware and thoughtful reader. Each is a trick, and together they train the reader to sniff out bunk and to reject the unacceptable.

Cultural setting[edit]
During the Restoration the print revolution began to change every aspect of British society. It became possible for anyone to spend a small amount of money and have his or her opinions published as a broadsheet, and to gain access to the latest discoveries in science, literature, and political theory, as books became less expensive and digests and "indexes" of the sciences grew more numerous. The difficulty lay in discerning truth from falsehood, credible claims from impossible one. Swift writes A Tale of a Tub in the guise of a narrator who is excited and gullible about what the new world has to offer, and feels that he is quite the equal or superior of any author who ever lived because he, unlike them, possesses 'technology' and newer opinions. Swift seemingly asks the question of what a person with no discernment but with a thirst for knowledge would be like, and the answer is the narrator of Tale of a Tub.

Swift was annoyed by people who were so eager to possess the newest knowledge that they failed to pose sceptical questions. If he was not a particular fan of the aristocracy, he was a sincere opponent of democracy, which was often viewed then as the sort of "mob rule" that led to the worst abuses of the English Interregnum. Swift's satire was intended to provide a genuine service by painting the portrait of conspiracy minded and injudicious writers.

At that time in England, politics, religion and education were unified in a way that they are not now. The monarch was the head of the state church. Each school (secondary and university) had a political tradition. Officially, there was no such thing as "Whig and Tory" at the time, but the labels are useful and were certainly employed by writers themselves. The two major parties were associated with religious and economic groups. The implications of this unification of politics, class, and religion are important. Although it is somewhat extreme and simplistic to put it this way, failing to be for the Church was failing to be for the monarch; having an interest in physics and trade was to be associated with dissenting religion and the Whig Party. When Swift attacks the lovers of all things modern, he is thereby attacking the new world of trade, of dissenting religious believers, and, to some degree, an emergent portion of the Whig Party.


Born of English parents in Ireland, Jonathan Swift was working as Sir William Temple's secretary at the time he composed A Tale of a Tub (1694–1697). The publication of the work coincided with Swift's striking out on his own, having despaired of getting a good "living" from Temple or Temple's influence. There is speculation about what caused the rift between Swift and his employer, but, as A. C. Elias persuasively argues, it seems that the final straw came with Swift's work on Temple's Letters. Swift had been engaged to translate Temple's French correspondence, but Temple, or someone close to Temple, edited the French text to make Temple seem both prescient and more fluent. Consequently, the letters and the translations Swift provided did not gibe, and, since Swift could not accuse Temple of falsifying his letters, and because the public would never believe that the retired state minister had lied, Swift came across as incompetent.

 It is hard to say what the Tale's satire is about, since it is about any number of things. It is most consistent in attacking misreading of all sorts. Both in the narrative sections and the digressions, the single human flaw that underlies all the follies Swift attacks is over-figurative and over-literal reading, both of the Bible and of poetry and political prose. The narrator is seeking hidden knowledge, mechanical operations of things spiritual, spiritual qualities to things physical, and alternate readings of everything.

Within the "tale" sections of the book, Peter, Martin, and Jack fall into bad company (becoming the official religion of the Roman empire) and begin altering their coats (faith) by adding ornaments. They then begin relying on Peter to be the arbitrator of the will. He begins to rule by authority (he remembered the handyman saying that he once heard the father say that it was acceptable to don more ornaments), until such a time that Jack rebels against the rule of Peter. Jack begins to read the will (the Bible) overly literally. He rips the coat to shreds to restore the original state of the garment which represents the "primitive Christianity" sought by dissenters. He begins to rely only upon "inner illumination" for guidance and thus walks around with his eyes closed, after swallowing candle snuffs. Eventually, Peter and Jack begin to resemble one another, and only Martin is left with a coat that is at all like the original.

An important factor in the reception of Swift's work is that the narrator of the work is an extremist in every direction. Consequently, he can no more construct a sound allegory than he can finish his digressions without losing control (eventually confessing that he is insane). For a Church of England reader, the allegory of the brothers provides small comfort. Martin has a corrupted faith, one full of holes and still with ornaments on it. His only virtue is that he avoids the excesses of his brothers, but the original faith is lost to him. Readers of the Tale have picked up on this unsatisfactory resolution to both "parts" of the book, and A Tale of a Tub has often been offered up as evidence of Swift's misanthropy.

As has recently been argued by Michael McKeon, Swift might best be described as a severe sceptic, rather than a Whig, Tory, empiricist, or religious writer. He supported the Classics in the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns, and he supported the established church and the aristocracy, because he felt the alternatives were worse. He argued elsewhere that there is nothing inherently virtuous about a noble birth, but its advantages of wealth and education made the aristocrat a better ruler than the equally virtuous but unprivileged commoner. A Tale of a Tub is a perfect example of Swift's devastating intellect at work. By its end, little seems worth believing in.

Formally, the satire in the Tale is historically novel for several reasons. First, Swift more or less invented prose parody. In the "Apology for the &c." (which was added in 1710), Swift explains that his work is, in several places, a "parody," which is where he imitates the style of persons he wishes to expose. What is interesting is that the word "parody" had not been used for prose before, and the definition he offers is arguably a parody of John Dryden defining "parody" in the Discourse of Satire (the Preface to Dryden's translations of Juvenal's and Persius' satires). Prior to Swift, parodies were imitations designed to bring mirth, but not primarily in the form of mockery. Dryden himself imitated the Aeneid in "MacFlecknoe" to describe the apotheosis of a dull poet, but the imitation made fun of the poet, and not of Virgil.

Additionally, Swift's satire is relatively unique in that he offers no resolutions. While he ridicules any number of foolish habits, he never offers the reader a positive set of values to embrace. While this type of satire became more common as people imitated Swift, later, Swift is quite unusual in offering the readers no way out. He does not persuade to any position, but he does persuade readers from an assortment of positions. This is one of the qualities that has made the Tale Swift's least-read major work.
 
Title page of the fifth edition, 1710, with the added Notes and Apology 

vineri, 14 martie 2014

SWARMS OF WORLDS THAT MAKE WORDS, SWARMS OF WORDS THAT MAKE WORLDS -SWARMWORLDS OF WORDS SWARMWORD'S THAT ARE SWORDS SMALL WORDS THAT TAKE WORLDS FROM WORD LORDS SMALL WORLDS THAT TAKE LORDS BY WORDS SMALL LORDS THAT TAKE WORDS FROM EVIL WORLDS

ESVOAÇAM AS PALAVRAS NO MUNDO

ESVOAÇA O MUNDO EM PALAVRAS

DESVANECE-SE O MUNDO NAS PALAVRAS MUDAS

Em futuros pouco puros

num presente dissidente

há muitos burros aos zurros

por um futuro decadente

num presente bem demente....



THE word is best

in any bestiarium you have the best

THEY ARE SWARM'S OF WORD'S THAT MAKE WORLDS

they are small swarm's of words and of worlds and BIG ones

For a society to be successful in growth and in cultural reproduction like the american society at least in the former Imperial years, you need diversity, you need the swarm's of the best in any bestiarium

words that make worlds

and words that take worlds like alea jacta est

bestiarium is a word with best in it,,,

the words are vectors for change

vectors that create new worlds .....................

luni, 10 februarie 2014

META DONA META O NARIZ ONDE NÃO É CHAMADO META A CABEÇA NA GUILHOTINA META O PÉ NUM CONSULTÓRIO TODAS AS METAS MATAM ALGUMAS META'S MATAM MAIS DEPRESSA QUE OUTRAS META O PÉ NO PARAÍSO AND GO TO HELL....

desnecessariamente se não se fizessem cirurgias cardíacas de todo?!Responder

A PERGUNTA TAMBÉM ERA UMA MERDA
E O PRÓPRIO AUTOR O RECONHECE AO METER UM PONTO DE EXCLAMAÇÃO !
ISTO É UMA PERGUNTA? !!!!!! DEVIA ATÉ TER-SE ADMIRADO MAIS



  1. No, the madmen have some ....cause for distress
    For instance you have a great range of medicaments that cause side-effects in small fringes of the population vulgus Populaça ou ralé....piolheira you know

    e morrem 2 ou 3 milhões por ano graças a isso
    and die 2 to 3 million's ...et caetera



    The adverse drug reactions are ranked below by frequency, using the following convention: very common (>1/10), common (>1/100, to <1/10); uncommon (> 1/1,000, to <1/100); rare (>1/10,000, to <1/1,000); very rare (<1/10,000), not known (cannot be estimated from available data).

    • Immune System Disorder: Very rare; Allergic reaction, including anaphylaxis, anaphylactic shock, anaphylactic reaction and angiodema

    • Endocrine disorder: Rare; increased prolactin levels

    • Psychiatric system disorders: Very rare: agitation, nervousness.

    • Nervous system disorders: Very rare; extrapyramidal side effects, convulsion, somnolence, headache, Not known; dystonia

    • Eye disorders: Not known; Oculogyric crisis

    • Cardiac disorders: Not known; Prolongation of QT interval; Not known; Ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death also occur, (see section 4.4 Special warnings and precautions for use). Torsades de Pointes have been reported with intravenouss domperidone, however, the possibility of this risk should be considered with oral forms of domperidone.

    • Gastro-intestinal disorders: Rare gastro-intestinal disorders including very rare transient intestinal cramps, very rare; diarrhoea

    • Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders: Very rare; urticaria, pruritus, rashes

    • Reproductive system and breast disorders: Uncommon: breast pain, Rare;galactorrhoea, gynaecomastia, amenorrhoea, Not known; reduced libido.

    • Investigations: very rare: liver function test abnormal.

    As the hypophysis is outside the blood brain barrier, domperidone may cause an increase in prolactin levels. In rare cases this hyperprolactinaemia may lead to neuro-endrocrinological side effects such as galactorrhoea, gynaecomastia and amenorrhoea. Extrapyramidal side effects are exceptional in adults. These side effects reverse spontaneously and completely as soon as treatment is stopped.

    Other central nervous system-related effects of convulsion, agitation, and somnolence also are very rare and primarily reported in infants and children.

    Mostly the Akathisia

    Motor restlessness or psychomotor aggitation
    May present as inability to sit still, pacing or wringing hands

    why do you think i'm writhing this shit

    sorry i forgot this or i have forgotten ths totem:  involuntary writhing movements caused by prenatal or perinatal brain damage.Other common causes of extrapyramidal symptoms include encephalitis and meningitis. Extrapyramidal symptoms

    well other extra-pyramidal effects

    several and the death rate with this shit is very low

    well tomorrow is possible to have a slight increase

    dystonic reaction facial muscle spasm, neck, back....

    isso deve-se ao facto da musculatura ser activada e não apenas a visceral

    por exemplo os da parte posterior mantém a sua estrutura simples de fibras musculares lisas seja o bicho um shark ou um humano a musculatura branquial que faz a ventilação branquial nos peixes fixes...e que estão na cabeça dos restantes vertebrados efectuam os movimentos na faringe daí que me seja ligeiramente difícil respirar neste momento

    mas ainda não é fatal, acho....devia poder-se chamar o 112 pela internet né

    ora aqui fica mais um apontamento para o próximo e-governo....

    ah nos outros vertebrados têm dupla função ventilação e alimentação nice né

    como costumava dizer aos meus alunos morre-se de paragem cardíaca. respiratória e de visitas ao médico

    logo yes o gajo tem toneladas de razão

    também salvam centos de milhões por ano né

    mas o mesmo se pode dizer das religiões
GAJO QUE DEVE TER SIDO REFORMADO ANTECIPADAMENTE POR DEUS
A ciência é boa para conhecer Deus e a sua Criação, usando-a correctamente e preservando-a.
Na verdade, é essa a sua principal função. UM BOM ARGUMENTO PARA ACABAR COM AS BOLSAS DE INVESTIGAÇÃO

23 dos arguidos no tribunal de Nuremberga eram médicos e cientistas, fortemente influenciados pelo eugenismo darwinista.

Provavelmente, concordavam com Charles Darwin quando este dizia que a pretensão de dignidade humana era puro preconceito natural e arrogância APESAR DE SER DIFÍCIL CONCORDAR COM UM TIPO A FAZER TIJOLO MAS HÁ QUEM O FAÇA
HÁ ATÉ QUEM OS COMA E LHES BEBA O SANGUE RITUALMENTE
Eles tinham exactamente as mesmas ideias que o FILHO DA MERCKEL DO ALEMÃO QUE APARENTEMENTE TEM I-DEI-AS QUE sustenta acerca de Génesis, da origem do homem e da existência de Deus.

duminică, 1 decembrie 2013

PROPAGANDA É O NOME DO JOGO - AS MENTIRAS SÃO A ARGAMASSA QUE LIGAM O HOMEM SELVAGEM INDIVIDUALISTA NA OBRA DE ALVENARIA OU DE MAÇONARIA SOCIAL - H.G.WELLS

A PROPAGANDA RESULTA NA OBRA ASSOCIAL QUE ESCRAVIZA OS HOMENS LIVRES AO BEM COMUM
COMUM A MUITOS MAS NÃO A TODOS 
É ESSE O ALTRUÍSMO DO HOMEM QUE MORRE PARA QUE A NOÇÃO VIVA
PROVAS  DO FUNCIONAMENTO DA MÁQUINA DE MATAR O SENSO COMUM DAS MASSAS
DENEGRIR OS ANTECESSORES QUE NOS DEIXARAM DE TANGA
SEJAM ELES REPUBLICANOS E LAICOS OU CÉSARES EM BOTÃO 
EXAGERANDO AS SUAS FALHAS OU OS SUCESSOS DOS PASSOS QUE SE SEGUIRAM
OU MESMO SEGURAM PER SEGURO....

POIS A CABEÇA DO REI DECAPITADO OU DA REPÚBLICA SEM CORPO NEM ALMA
 NOS SESTÉRCIOS QUE PAGAM O SAL QUE DIZEM SER SALARIUM
ASSEGURAM AO LEGIONÁRIO ROMANO OU AO SERVIÇO DO GALO GAULÊS 
QUE OS LEÕES DA BABILÓNIA VIVEM ETERNAMENTE NA TERNA CIVILIZAÇÃO

SÍMBOLOS DO PODER QUE SÃO PROPAGANDA 



Bernays' honest and practical manual provides much insight into some of the most powerful and influential institutions of contemporary industrial state capitalist democracies."--Noam Chomsky
"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country."--Edward Bernays, "Propaganda"
A seminal and controversial figure in the history of political thought and public relations, Edward Bernays (1891-1995), pioneered the scientific technique of shaping and manipulating public opinion, which he famously dubbed "engineering of consent." During World War I, he was an integral part of the U.S. Committee on Public Information (CPI), a powerful propaganda apparatus that was mobilized to package, advertise and sell the war to the American people as one that would "Make the World Safe for Democracy." The CPI would become the blueprint in which marketing strategies for future wars would be based upon.
Bernays applied the techniques he had learned in the CPI and, incorporating some of the ideas of Walter Lipmann, became an outspoken proponent of propaganda as a tool for democratic and corporate manipulation of the population. His 1928 bombshell "Propaganda" lays out his eerily prescient vision for using propaganda to regiment the collective mind in a variety of areas, including government, politics, art, science and education. To read this book today is to frightfully comprehend what our contemporary institutions of government and business have become in regards to organized manipulation of the masses.
This is the first reprint of "Propaganda" in over 30 years and features an introduction by Mark Crispin Miller, author of "The Bush Dyslexicon: Observations on a National Disorder

duminică, 3 noiembrie 2013

O 25 DE ABRIL FOI A CONTINUAÇÃO DO ESTADO NOVO POR OUTROS MEIOS OU AINDA O É? VAI UM EURO 2004 PRA GASTAR OS EUROS 2002? DÍVIDA METÓDICA DO MUNDO PORTUGUÊS E DOS OUTROS MUNDOS QUE ELE DEU OU PEDIU EMPRESTADOS

PRIMEIRO VIERAM PELOS PARVOS NINGUÉM LIGOU QUE HAVIAM MUITOS
DEPOIS VIERAM PELO MORSI NINGUÉM LIGOU QUE ERA SÓ UM
DEPOIS VIERAM PELA IRMANDADE AGENTE ACHOU BEM QUE HOMENS QUE DIZEM QUE SÃO IRMÃOS E REZAM ENCIMA DO CU DE OUTROS DEVEM SER CRISTOBAL CÓLON’S…
ÓDESPOIS VIERAM POR UM GREGO QUE ERA DA FALANGE ROLANTE E LIGÁMOS BUÉ QUE O TIPO CANTAVA E TUDO E CORTAR O PIO A QUEM TEM A CANÇÃO POR ARMA É ANTI-CONSTITUCIONAL
DEPOIS VIERAM PELOS NÚMEROS QUE SÃO O ESTADO E A GENTE NÃ LIGOU QUE AS PESSOAS NÃO SÃO NÚMEROS
DEPOIS VIERAM PELO SEGURO E O SEGURO DEU À COSTA
DEPOOIS VIERAM PELOS NAZIS E ESBURACARAM DOIS E AGENTE ACHOU BEM PORQUE OS GAJOS NEM SABIAM CANTAR …..
ENFIM ATÉ NOS PODEM VIR BUSCAR A NÓS CAGENTE JÁ NEM LIGA…..
AGORA VIERAM PELOS NÚMEROS NO ESTADO….
NÚMEROS QUEREMOS LÁ SABER DE NÚMEROS

SÓ SE FOREM OS DO EUROMILHÕES……

vineri, 25 octombrie 2013

SOCRATES DEVAGARINHO DEVAGARINHO REGRESSA AOS AMORES PLATÓNICOS POR UMA PÁTRIA GREGA SEM OSTRAS PRA BOTAR NAS URNAS- INFELIZMENTE DEVAGARINHO VINHA MUITO DEPRESSA.....

  • ORA ANÁLISE DO TEXTO DA BIMBY….
    a agastura …….ESTAS GENTES DO RESTOLHO….DEMODÉ’S USAM ARCHAISMOS E TAXIARCHAS….que vai na pátria NOÇÃO MAÇÃO DE NAÇÃO com o espalhafatoso regresso de SOcrates O GREGO QUE SE FOI AO GAY PARIS NA GUERRA POR HELENA QUE NUM ERA DE TRÓIA .
    Na modesta opinião DA LURDES MODESTO DE SERVIÇO Portugal precisa de ver e ouvir SOARES todos os dias. POIS SÓ ARES É DIVERTIDO
    E PARA A CHUSMA DE VELHOS VER SOARES NA TELEVISÃO É SIGNAL QUE DURAM MAIS UNS ANOS OU PELO MENOS PODEM TER ESPERANÇA
    QUE O SNS NÃO É O HOSPITAL DA LUZ
    MAS O HOSPITAL DA LUZ A REBENTAR PELAS COSTURAS DAS ANGUSTURAS
    CHEIO DAS GRIPADAS NOMENKLATURAS
    PARA LÁ CAMINHA ….OU SE CALHAR VIANA
    DAÍ QUE ALGUNS VELHOS DERIVASSEM PARA OUTROS SISTEMAS DE APOIO DE VIDA
    E RETIRASSEM UNS MILHARES DE MILHÕES À BANCA ….
    PARA CUSTEAR TRATAMENTOS FUTUROS DE MEMÓRIA
    OU MESMO DE FALTA DELA
    JÁ SOCRATES SEMPRE FOI MAIS CHATO QUE FIDEL
    UMA VEZ A GENTE INDA AGUENTA
    AGORA De cada vez que ele começa com as contas do nunca acabar do PEC IV,
    mais os bandalhos e os estupores, sem esquecer o rancor, as conspirações, as memórias construídas (e as explicações mais deselegantes alguma vez pronunciadas sobre a sua vida privada por um politico português) o país percebe que aquele homem TEM UMA VIDA TRAMADA EM PARIS POIS NENHUM EMIGRANTE QUE SE PREZE VOLTA Ó TORRÓN D’ALICANTE PÁ TRIO OU MÉNAGE A TROIS PARA DIZER QUE FOI ENRABADO PELOS BOCHES OU PELOS CHOUAN’S DE BRUX’ELLES
    SOCRATES tem condições para exercer um cargo político fora da Venezuela….BASTA VER QUE BERLUSCONI VIVE EM ITALIA …JÁ O SARKOZY VIVIA NUM LADO QUALQUER E O CAMERON VIVE NOS CAMARÕES OU NOUTRO GOLFO DA GUINÉ ALI AO PÉ…..
    . Resguardado, Sócrates protege-se do seu pior inimigo: ele mesmo…..POIS TIRANDO SOCRATES SOCRATES NÃO TEM COMPETIÇÃO
    POIS É MAIS DETERMINADO A FAZER MERDA DO QUE SANTANA
    E TORCE AS PALAVRAS MAIS QUE MARCELO
    E ATÉ A DIZER BABOSEIRAS É SUPERIOR A SAMPAIO E SOARES JUNTOS
    BOLAS ESTAMOS A MENOSPREZÁ-LO NEM COM O ALMEIDA SANTOS E O MANUEL ALEGRE E AQUELE PATETA ALEGRE QUE ALÉM DE DOUTOR TAMBÉM É NOBRE SE CONSEGUIA DIZER TANTA BABOSEIRA E TÃO TÃO CREDÍVEL
    EN SOCRATES TEMOS FÉ GRITA A JUVENTUS CU RUPTA DE ATHENAS….
    Assim se SÓ ARES quiser continuarão a saltar entrevistas boazinhas e fofinhas – QUE SÓ ARES É GRANDE E MONOPOLIZA A IN FOR MAÇÃO MAIS QUE A ISABEL DOS SANTOS E OS RESTANTES PRETOS DA GUINÉ ….
    sobretudo essas VISTAS E ENTRE VISTAS DO MATERIAL DO GAJO são essenciais…..
    SÃO ESSENCIAIS PARA QUÊ?
    OBVIAMENTE DADO O NÍVEL DO DISCURSO OU DO DIZ QUE É CURSO A LA SOCRATES O ESSENCIAL É QUE INTERESSA
    O PARA QUÊ
    ISSO NÃO INTERESSA
    PARA COISÍSSIMA NENHUMA
    porque a disparidade de critérios com o entrevistado Sócrates é tão gritante que acaba a ter um efeito contrário – e SOcrates vai-se mostrando MAIS SEGURO QUE MOURO NA COSTA
    OU MESMO QUE OTHELO O MOURO DE VENEZA
    COM A SUA TÉCNICA DE GOLPE DE ESTADO
    DOS TEMPOS DA LEGIO DO MALAPARTE
    ÇA IRA ÇA IRA
    A GUARDA AGUARDA SOCRATES MAS NÃO SE RENDE....

SOCRATES DEVE CARINHO DEVAGARINHO LÁ SE VAI PLATONICAMENTE APAIXONANDO PELOS GREGOS SEM OSTRAS PRA BOTAR NAS URNAS....INFELIZMENTE DEVAGARINHO VINHA MUITO DEPRESSA...

    • ORA ANÁLISE DO TEXTO DA BIMBY….
      a agastura …….ESTAS GENTES DO RESTOLHO….DEMODÉ’S USAM ARCHAISMOS E TAXIARCHAS….que vai na pátria NOÇÃO MAÇÃO DE NAÇÃO com o espalhafatoso regresso de SOcrates O GREGO QUE SE FOI AO GAY PARIS NA GUERRA POR HELENA QUE NUM ERA DE TRÓIA .
      Na modesta opinião DA LURDES MODESTO DE SERVIÇO Portugal precisa de ver e ouvir SOARES todos os dias. POIS SÓ ARES É DIVERTIDO
      E PARA A CHUSMA DE VELHOS VER SOARES NA TELEVISÃO É SIGNAL QUE DURAM MAIS UNS ANOS OU PELO MENOS PODEM TER ESPERANÇA
      QUE O SNS NÃO É O HOSPITAL DA LUZ
      MAS O HOSPITAL DA LUZ A REBENTAR PELAS COSTURAS DAS ANGUSTURAS
      CHEIO DAS GRIPADAS NOMENKLATURAS
      PARA LÁ CAMINHA ….OU SE CALHAR VIANA
      DAÍ QUE ALGUNS VELHOS DERIVASSEM PARA OUTROS SISTEMAS DE APOIO DE VIDA
      E RETIRASSEM UNS MILHARES DE MILHÕES À BANCA ….
      PARA CUSTEAR TRATAMENTOS FUTUROS DE MEMÓRIA
      OU MESMO DE FALTA DELA
      JÁ SOCRATES SEMPRE FOI MAIS CHATO QUE FIDEL
      UMA VEZ A GENTE INDA AGUENTA
      AGORA De cada vez que ele começa com as contas do nunca acabar do PEC IV,
      mais os bandalhos e os estupores, sem esquecer o rancor, as conspirações, as memórias construídas (e as explicações mais deselegantes alguma vez pronunciadas sobre a sua vida privada por um politico português) o país percebe que aquele homem TEM UMA VIDA TRAMADA EM PARIS POIS NENHUM EMIGRANTE QUE SE PREZE VOLTA Ó TORRÓN D’ALICANTE PÁ TRIO OU MÉNAGE A TROIS PARA DIZER QUE FOI ENRABADO PELOS BOCHES OU PELOS CHOUAN’S DE BRUX’ELLES
      SOCRATES tem condições para exercer um cargo político fora da Venezuela….BASTA VER QUE BERLUSCONI VIVE EM ITALIA …JÁ O SARKOZY VIVIA NUM LADO QUALQUER E O CAMERON VIVE NOS CAMARÕES OU NOUTRO GOLFO DA GUINÉ ALI AO PÉ…..
      . Resguardado, Sócrates protege-se do seu pior inimigo: ele mesmo…..POIS TIRANDO SOCRATES SOCRATES NÃO TEM COMPETIÇÃO
      POIS É MAIS DETERMINADO A FAZER MERDA DO QUE SANTANA
      E TORCE AS PALAVRAS MAIS QUE MARCELO
      E ATÉ A DIZER BABOSEIRAS É SUPERIOR A SAMPAIO E SOARES JUNTOS
      BOLAS ESTAMOS A MENOSPREZÁ-LO NEM COM O ALMEIDA SANTOS E O MANUEL ALEGRE E AQUELE PATETA ALEGRE QUE ALÉM DE DOUTOR TAMBÉM É NOBRE SE CONSEGUIA DIZER TANTA BABOSEIRA E TÃO TÃO CREDÍVEL
      EN SOCRATES TEMOS FÉ GRITA A JUVENTUS CU RUPTA DE ATHENAS….
      Assim se SÓ ARES quiser continuarão a saltar entrevistas boazinhas e fofinhas – QUE SÓ ARES É GRANDE E MONOPOLIZA A IN FOR MAÇÃO MAIS QUE A ISABEL DOS SANTOS E OS RESTANTES PRETOS DA GUINÉ ….
      sobretudo essas VISTAS E ENTRE VISTAS DO MATERIAL DO GAJO são essenciais…..
      SÃO ESSENCIAIS PARA QUÊ?
      OBVIAMENTE DADO O NÍVEL DO DISCURSO OU DO DIZ QUE É CURSO A LA SOCRATES O ESSENCIAL É QUE INTERESSA
      O PARA QUÊ
      ISSO NÃO INTERESSA
      PARA COISÍSSIMA NENHUMA
      porque a disparidade de critérios com o entrevistado Sócrates é tão gritante que acaba a ter um efeito contrário – e SOcrates vai-se mostrando MAIS SEGURO QUE MOURO NA COSTA
      OU MESMO QUE OTHELO O MOURO DE VENEZA
      COM A SUA TÉCNICA DE GOLPE DE ESTADO
      DOS TEMPOS DA LEGIO DO MALAPARTE
      SOCRATES O GREGO 
      NÃO O NEGO
      A GUARDA QUE POR ELE AGUARDA NEM SE RENDE NEM AVANÇA...